Screened as part of NZIFF 2017

Belle de Jour 1967

Directed by Luis Buñuel Big Nights

In Luis Buñuel’s surreal 60s classic, Catherine Deneuve’s porcelain perfection hides a cracked interior in one of her most iconic roles: Séverine, a Paris housewife who begins secretly spending her after¬noon hours working in a bordello.

France In French with English subtitles
100 minutes DCP

Director

Producers

Robert Hakim
,
Raymond Hakim

Screenplay

Luis Buñuel
,
Jean-Claude Carrière. Based on the novel by Joseph Kessel

Photography

Sacha Vierney

Editor

Louisette Hautecoeur

Production designer

Robert Clavel

Costume designers

Hélène Nourry
,
Yves Saint Laurent

With

Catherine Deneuve (Séverine)
,
Jean Sorel (Pierre)
,
Michel Piccoli (Husson)
,
Geneviève Page (Anaïs)
,
Francisco Rabal (Hippolyte)
,
Pierre Clémenti (Marcel)
,
Françoise Fabian (Charlotte)
,
Maria Latour (Mathilde)
,
Francis Blanche (M. Adolphe)
,
Georges Marchal (the Duke)
,
François Maistre (the Professor)
,
Macha Méril (Renée)
,
Muni (Pallas)
,
Dominique Dandreiux (Catherine)
,
Bernard Musson (the thin man)
,
Brigitte Parmentier (Séverine as a child)

Festivals

Cannes (Classics)
,
Sydney 2017

Elsewhere

Presented in Association With

Viva NZH

The unchallenged classic of elegant kink, wrought by the cinema’s great surrealist Luis Buñuel on the cool beauty of Catherine Deneuve, returns, direct from its 50th-birthday celebrations in Cannes in a stunning new 4K restoration.

“Catherine Deneuve is married to the handsomest, wealthiest young doctor in the land, but she can’t bear to have him touch her – instead, she spends her afternoons in a discreet Paris brothel, brusquely handled by gangsters, kinksters, and one Kalmyk with a magic box. Between workdays she dreams of even more humiliating encounters, starring her husband and different kinds of knots. The endless appeal of Belle de Jour, I won’t be the first to say, is its insistence on the fantasy and the reality; one doesn’t replace or resolve the other, just as cobbling together an origin story to explain our most singular obsessions cannot exorcise them. As Buñuel knew, a shoe is a shoe is a shoe – unless it’s so much more.”— Elina Mishuris, The L Magazine

“If, for us jaded children and grandchildren of the 60s, 40 years of bombardment by explicit sexual imagery has made that [original] impact unrecoverable, the undiminished power of the film resides more in the mesmeric audacity of Buñuel’s method. The productive friction – be it between the salacious material and the ‘chaste’ formality of how it’s observed; the ersatz ‘elegance’ of the salon and the perverse etiquettes of the Yves Saint Laurent-clothed, cigarette-chewing prostitutes and their clients; or the hallucinatory melding of fantasy and reality – still generates heat like a nuclear reactor.”— Wally Hammond, Time Out